www.ereniku.net
By
Mehdi Hyseni Ph.D
Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:23 am
Essay
By Mehdi Hyseni*
Bye
Colonial Serbia, for ever!
***THE SERBIAN "NEW FORMULA": "KOSOVA IN SERBIA AND SERBIA
IN EUROPE" IS AN ANTI-EUROPEAN, ANTI-DEMOCRATIC, UNCIVILIZED AND ANTI-ALBANIAN
FORMULA
So long as Serbia's Belgrade-based government continues to practice the
Great-Serbian and genocidal politics of the previous uncivilized, anti-democratic,
anti-Albanian, anti-European and anti-American regime of criminal-in-chief,
Slobodan Milosevic, proclaiming the notion that Kosova is an integral part of
Serbia's territory, it will remain clear why negotiations in Vienna between
Serbian and Albanian "work groups," led by international envoy of
the United Nations Security Council Marti Ahtisari, were marked by abortive
epilog (2006).
Throughout the duration of these negotiations, the euro-international
community played acrobatics with real politics while practicing no political
realism at all. Had there been an observance of political realism, then justly
the international community would not have consulted the Belgrade government
similar to that of the handling of a pampered child (and after Serbia's commitment
of ten colonial genocides in Kosova and Ethnic Albania during the time period
of 1842-1999), but instead would consider the reality of the terrain in Kosova.
By this, they would abide to the provisions of the United Nations Chart and
International Law norms that are in favor of the historical and self-determination
rights of Albanians and Kosova. After all, historically since 1371 Kosova had
been a part of the Albanian feudal state of the Balshajs which was then conquered
by the Ottoman Empire 18 years later in 1389. Kosova has always been a part
of the greater Illyrian culture and was formally tied to the Balshajs over six
centuries ago, proving that Kosova has been an inalienable part of ethnic Albanian
identity. This neither has a connection with being the Serbian "cradle"
and "heart" nor with Serbia, as has been proclaimed through centuries
of the politics, propaganda and diplomacy of the Serbian Orthodox Church and
Great Serbia.
In this context, Kosova is not a matter of territorial dispute, because
historically it has been an integral part of Ethnic Albania. However there are
two prevalent irrational and outlaw factors that make the optimal solution
for Kosova problematic: (1) the regressive politics of Great-Serbian colonialism
which even today , after the overturn of the anti-Albanian and genocidal regime
of Slobodan Milosevic, continues to consider Albanian Kosova as its "legal
and legitimate property" and (2) the traditional real politics of the new
Bismark in today's so called integral, multiethnic and democratic European nations;
the unabashed bias in their political philosophy made evident in their decisions
to include Serbia in an international debate to resolve Kosova's status.
If all of the actors and "mentors" who are involved in Kosova's
issue aim to truly resolve it in the interest of both Albanians and Serbian
parts, then it's necessary for them to consider the historical, democratic and
juridical-geopolitical criterion in order to designate both parties with what
legally belongs to them. Serbia must remain within its natural Chetnik Serbian
Shumadia borders, whereas Kosova ought to remain in that place where it has
been forever cradled: Ethnic Albania. Justified historically, politically and
democratically, this would be the optimal and the only right compromise that
could reconcile these two antagonized parties, opposed as a result of centuries
of genocide and Great-Serbian colonialism on the Albanian nation and the indigenous
territories of natural Ethnic Albania. Otherwise, Europe and the Balkans will
confront again upon the invading politics and genocide of today's "democratic"
Serbia, a state that has traditionally had the support of Russia.
Precisely, it was these illusions and utopian ideas of Serbia that amounted
to produce enough of an influence upon Serbs and the Serbian Orthodox Church
that they selected their fanatical and fallacious "messiah" Slobodan
Milosevic, a disastrous result of Serbian collective paranoia, nationalism,
and auto-destructive Serb-centrism. Apparent by the three military and
paramilitary aggressions and genocides committed in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosova
(1992-1999), these factors clearly had negative consequences on Serbia's general
church and state policy.
If these horrible, antihuman, antidemocratic, uncivilized and criminal
acts of Milosevic's Serbia against the mentioned ex-Yugoslavian
countries are not taken into account seriously, and if the independence of Kosova
is rejected, there's no doubt that current Serbian authorities (President
Boris Tadic, Prime Ministers Vojislav Kostunica and Vuk Jeremic, Tomislav Nicolic,
and bishop Artemije Radosavljevic) will finish their political and ecclesiastical
careers like Slobodan Milosevic.
The Belgrade government, all Serbian extremist elements and the Serbian
Orthodox Church led by Bishop Artemije Radosavljevic should understand very
clearly that only through the achievement of a rational political compromise
will there be a guaranty of Serbia's access into the European Union (EU). Thus,
Serbian policy, the Serbian Orthodox Church and all Serbian people should agree
with Albanian bitter trust, that only after the definitive withdrawal of colonial
Serbia from Kosova and the other territories of Ethnic Albania, will there be
real conditions and circumstances created for normalization of the political,
diplomatic, economic and commercial relations with Kosova and Ethnic Albania.
Only this just and profitable compromise for both parties in the conflict can
eliminate the alleged new democratic and civilized European formula created
by Great-Serbian fascists and colonialists, which is reflected in the model,
"Kosova in Serbia, and Serbia in Europe". Such an ideology is a direct
historical, political and propagandistic product of Great Serbia which can be
traced back to the ideas articulated in Ilia Grasanin's "Nacertania"
(1844). Similar products such as "Memorandum" (1986) released by the
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts as well as other anti-Albanian genocide
memorandums and projects of the Serbian Orthodox Church were created in order
to promote enlargement of territories of Great Serbia, also providing rationale
to exterminate the historical continuity of Albanian extermination, as territories
of Ethnic Albania were broken and conquered. There's no way to recognize this
in the 21st century without taking into consideration Serbia's official policies
addressing Albanians, particularly when it comes to their objection of Kosova's
independence.
The recognition of Kosova's independence is no precedence, neither for
international law nor to the peace and stability of the Balkans, such as is
speculated by the antidemocratic and propagandistic politics of the Belgrade-based
government and the Serbian Orthodox Church, who are by whatever means fighting
to convince Europe and America that "Kosova is the cradle and heart"
of Serbia.
As mentioned above, the matter of Kosova's independence is not problematical
in any aspect, be it historical, juridical, political, democratic or ethnic
minority related, but for the time being it is still an unresolved colonial
issue like the Albanian National question in the Balkans.
Good Morning, and happy birthday my independent Kosova!
Sunday, February 17, 2008 was a grandiose day for all Albanians and their friends
all of the world who supported them to be free from Serbian colonialism
and hegemony because of fact that Kosova's Parliament declares independence
of Kosova, which the day after immediately was recognized by the United States
of America and some of European Union countries such United Kingdom, France,
Italy, Germany, Austria..., etc.
Therefore, by rights that day we can call as a historical because Kosova for
the first time in its history becomes independent and sovereign state
in Balkans. Indeed, for that day Albanians have been waited long time almost
100 hundred years by reason of Serbia's colonialism and annexation
of Kosova(1912-1999).
According to history and international law Kosovo deserves to be independent
and recognized by the international community, regardless of Russia's
illegitimate contradiction that "unilateral recognition independence
of Kosovo is precedence and crushing of the international
law". This appraisal is inexistent because of fact that historically
and juridical, Kosova has never been legal part of Serbia, but only as
an illegal and alienated part of its territory and sovereignty which has
fissured from the indigenous territory of the Ethnic Albania by force and genocide
supported from the Russia and European Great Powers in the London Conference
of Ambassadors (1913).
It's worth fact to remember Serbia's authorities and its scholars,
that when Serbia has been recognized as an independent state by European
Great Powers in Berlin's Congress in 1878, then Kosovo wasn't
within its territorial and state sovereignty, but under the Ottoman Empire until
1912,
However, this truth de facto and de jure Serbia and Serbs know very
well, but they have never accepted it as such, because it was in favor
of their colonial interests in Kosova, and other territories of the Ethnic
Albania (such is Presheva, Bujaboci and Medevegja).
Thank you America!
For rescue over two millions people, support and recognition of
independence of Kosova ( beside the Kosova Liberation Army-KLA- UK-Ushtria lirimtare
e Kosovs) is meritorious the United States of America with its direct
historical, political, diplomatic, economic, humanitarian, military, juridical
and peace-loving deed.
This is a main human and rational reason why all Albanians people in Balkans
and all of the world must be grateful and loyal ally, good and confident
friend united for ever with our loved homeland America.
Thank you Amereica!
Long live America!
United we stand for ever!
_____________
*Author is Ph.D. in International Relations

By Mehdi
Hyseni Ph.D
Tue, January 29, 2008 7:52 am
Kosova
in Great Serbian “soccer diplomacy”(!)
Recently I had
opportunity to read an article under title “The case against Kosovo
independence” written by Miodrag Isakov, ambassador of Serbia
in Israel, which is published in “The Jerusalem Post”, December
12, 2007.
However, his
simulation is more than a diplomatic nonsense because of fact
that he has confounded booth diplomatic and soccer sport rules
attempting to justify “Serbian international law” that
“traditionally”
Serbia
has the historical right to rule Albanian Kosova as “its inalienable part” of
Serbia’s
territory. But the truth is another, in Albanians side.
Kosova has never
been legal part of
Serbia’s
territory and sovereignty, but illegal its colony (1912-1999). Albanians have
never been the minority in Kosova, but vast majority from 1371 when they have
had their state under Balshaj rulers . This historical fact is unknown for
Serbian ambassador in Tel Aviv, and for the Serbian history, politics and
diplomacy entirely. On the contrary of this fact, Serbian ambassador Miodrag
Isakov this “diplomatic” commentary has written in order to
oppose the right of independence of Kosova, trying to
“justify” that through his imaginable soccer
game between
Israel
and
England:
“If I were to say that
Israel
deserved to qualify for the European championship, most local football fans
might agree.
Israel
played really well - the best ever”.
Okay, if Israel
plays very well soccer game, there is no doubt that it will be as
one of the first finalist of the world championship, if not there’s no any
rules which is going to help it to go ahead in final, regardless
desire of its fans. In this case the rules are very clear. Therefore
there’s no need to interfere any of international
arbiters to help
Israel
in this case.
To understand this
paragraph is not necessary to be acknowledgeable of world
classic or modern diplomatic history, but is enough to be objective and
realist to say the truth what does Israel mean in
this case, and what does England mean in this “ soccer sport
diplomatic ” context expounded by Serbian ambassador Miodrag Isakov.
First, on the one
side, through
Israel
is reflected fans “Desire” to go ahead to get championship
reason is that “Israel
is playing well – the best ever”. Second, whereas in the other side, Serbian
ambassador, express oneself “Desire” that England merits also to be qualified
for championship because it has long traditional history in soccer
game, respectively “England invented the soccer ”. However according through
the “deepest diplomatic acknowledge” expressed in sport vocabulary “style”
by Miodrag Isakov neither Israel nor England can be qualified for
championship as he comes to conclusion because of the fact that
he said “there are certain rules and conditions which preclude
that from happening.”
Seen diplomatically,
Isakov with Israel example has compared Kosova which really
plays very good “soccer game” because one plays in its homeland which
is in accordance with all definite rules of
“international soccer” i.e. in historical, political and diplomatic sense
within international community in a consequence of it Kosova got
support of the United States, the United Nations, the European Union and NATO
in holding of it’s independence. Meanwhile, with
England
example is compared
Serbia
under the pretext that one has “long historical tradition upon Kosovo”. In
this case, Serbian ambassador tried to say to
Serbia
allies and supporters that
Serbia
has historical right on Kosovo because one “legally” is “office-holder”/
“land-owner” of Albanian Kosova. However, this “sportive conclusion”
is very wrong and fickle historically because there are
no any valid and justifiable arguments that Kosova has ever
been
Serbia’s
land. This is main reason why the international community
factors (USA,
OUN, EU and NATO) are determined to support independence on Kosova.
However, apart from
these arguments, Miodrag Isakov is served with his very limited
and thoughtless “diplomatic” appraisals in sportive manner that
“Israel and England will not be qualified for championship because there are
certain rules and conditions which preclude that from happening”(Ibidem). This
is very bed logical mistake of Serbian ambassador’s when he says that “Israel
and
England
cannot move ahead for championship because of the fact that “there are
certain rules and conditions” from which depend their qualification to get in
finale soccer game.
In this case the
international rules and conditions aren’t any kind of
stumble-stones, if
Israel
and
England
play good soccer, but, if not, the rules and conditions are very clear, nobody
can blame ones. If
Israel
and
England
will have fallen as a consequence of their week party
games, apparently nobody normal individual couldn’t insist “that
Israel
and
England
take part in the finals…” regardless of fans “desire” as
Serbia’s
ambassador Miodrag Isakov was concluded.
This comparison is
wrong and absurd in diplomatic sense even though Serbian and Albanian
negotiations of Kosova’s status have been fallen during
last two years(2005-2007) under the United Nations monitoring
mission. That does not mean that Albanian side must be eliminated from the
legal support of international community because ones fulfill all designated
conditions and rules in accordance with international law and
the United Nations Charter to be independent state.
These are fair and
legal rules which official Belgrade must take into account if Serbia wants to
remain in further soccer games of qualification for the championship, but one
didn’t accept these rules of the game of the international professional soccer
in appreciation that doesn’t need to play more any game because of the fact
that it consider itself the first finalist of the world championship
under the international law, the UN Security Council Resolution 1244(June
10,1999), and the United Nations Charter which guarantees “Serbian sovereignty
and territorial integrity /that means/ Kosovo is a part of that sovereign
state- the Republic of Serbia” (Ibidem).
Apart from this M.
Iskaov’s “desire” and invalid explanation in international law context, by
which apparently “Kosovo belong to Serbia”, ones cannot be
approved by the United Nations Security Council because Serbia
doesn’t have historical and international right to hold still Kosovo as “it’s
national territory” because of the fact that historically Kosova concerns to
ethnic Albania and Albanians, not to Serbia or Yugoslavia as Serbian
ambassador “describes” in this commentary for “The Jerusalem Post”. Kosovo has
never been legally part of territory and sovereignty of
Serbia
respectively
Yugoslavia,
except illegal their classic colony from 1912 to June10, 1999).
No
bona fide interpretation of diplomacy and international law
without basic acknowledgement of world history!
Serbian ambassador M.Isakov in
Israel
doesn’t know history of Albanians and Ethnic Albania in
Balkans. As if he knows it, he wouldn’t make a lot of cardinal mistakes
in his attempt to interpret the truth of Albanian –
Serbian historical and political relations aforetime and
today.
Therefore, he wouldn’t have had valid reason to criticize
right estimation that “Kosova deserves independence”, asserts
through a commentary by his colleague Albanian ambassador Tonin
Gjuraj in
Israel,
published in the same newspaper “The Jerusalem Post” in Telaviv.
As a
consequence of unknowingness of Balkan’s history, Serbian ambassador i Tel
Aviv, Miodrag Isakov reflects unconsidered arguments in
disfavor of independence of Kosova in historical and
international law context of his wrong and tendentious thesis
interpreted according to colonial history, politics and diplomacy of interest
of Greater Serbia (1878-1999).
Ethnic
Albania
is older than Miodrag Isakov
and
his Serbian Hitler colonizers in Balkans
In
appreciation wrongly historical retrospective of Ethnic Albania
and
Albanias
in Balkans, Serbian ambassador in
Israel,
Miodrad Isakov did several historical and political mistakes,
as following :
M.Isakov:
“Regarding
the rights of national minorities, Albanians of Kosovo included, it is clear
that creating a state of their own is not one of those rights.”
This appreciation is
falls because of the fact that Miodrag Isakov didn’t take into account
Albanian historical and statistics data that ones continually
in their history up today proved the valid arguments that Albanians always
have been majority people in Kosova, not as Serbian
minority nomads and colonizers of Albanian Kosova, respectively Ethnic
Albania which Serbian science, politics, propaganda and Serbian
Church is called “Great Albania” in order to preserve ideology and practice
of their Great Serbia, created by Ilia Grasanin (Nacertania, 1844).
Precisely, Ilia Garasanin’s “Nacertania” as Serbian national program was a
main cause of the break out of three aggressions
and genocides of Slobodan Milosevic’s Serbia (1992-1999) against Croatia,
Bosnia end Kosova that had intends to enlarge borders of Great Serbia on
account of the Croatians, Bosnians and Albanians ethnic territories, like
hundred’s years ago when Serbia had annexed indigenous
territories of Croatia’s, Hungary’s and Albania’s as
well as (1878- 2008).
This our estimation
about enlargement of Great Serbia on the back of the territories of its
neighboring countries attest this exact paradigm : “At the time
of the Eastern crisis, this ethnic situation was present in the southern
Balkans: 1.6 - 1.7 million Albanians on 58,000 km2 of the ethnic trunk; 1.4
million Greeks on 51,300 km2, 1.6 million Serbs on 38,000 km2 and 190,000
Montenegrins on 4,700 km2. By the Congress of Berlin and the Ambassadorial
Conference in London, Greece became 2.7 times larger, Montenegro 3 times and
Serbia 2.8 times, by stretching onto Vojvodina by the Conference of
Versailles. Now
Serbia
intends to stretch its state sovereignty onto 1/2 of
Bosnia
and Herzegovina
and a part of
Croatia,
therefore, onto another 25,000 km2.” (Source:
www.albanur.net, “This Memorandum of the
Forum of Albanian Intellectuals was sent on 26 October 1995 to the foreign
prime ministers of USA, Great Britain, France, Germany and Russia.).
M.Isakov:An independent Kosovo would be another Albanian state in
Europe.
“
Mister Serbian
ambassador why would be wrong (legally, in the context of the international
law) if Kosova will be granted with independence, recognized by the
Unite
States
and European Union(EU)? – Maybe you as Serbian ambassador don’t know that in
the world there are many independent states which constituted by the same
nation. If you want to be convinced in this truth, please take a look the
“world map” in order that next time wouldn’t good for you as
ambassador to make such banal historical, politics and
diplomatic mistakes, which are not only absurd but and too much
comical for public opinion.
M.
Isakov: “Two states, side by side, for about four million people - that would
be difficult to explain to Israelis who are struggling to preserve a single
Jewish state. “
First of all, I need
to improve Miodrag Isacov’s falls statistic
number that Kosova and Albania as two states have only “four
million people”, the truth is not 4.000.000 but around
6.000.000 million people for what Israel doesn’t need to get any
kind of explanation from Kosova and Albania because of fact
that Israel very well knows that is Albanian’s issue not itself own.
This third mistake
really is not only banal but and very provocative, expressed in tradition
manner of Serbia’s propaganda only which intend to “convince”
Israelis politics and diplomacy that Israel doesn’t need to recognize the
independence of Kosova as a “second state” of Albanians in Balkans. This
comparison doesn’t concern to state history and politics of Israelis and
Israel,
in consequence of that Kosova has never been
legal part of
Serbia,
but Ethnic Albania. Therefore, notwithstanding of M. Isakov’s
Great Serbian propaganda developed in Tel Aviv in order to poise
Israel’s mass-media in disfavor of Kosova’s
independence, there’s no doubt that Israel will recognize
Kosova’s independence at the same time when United States and European Union
recognized it.
Like the United
States and European Union and Israel politics and diplomacy ought to
decode the Serbian anti-Albanian propaganda with such
danger message that intend to bring in confrontation
friend relationship between Israelis and Albanians. In
this context both Israelis and Albanian have to be very vise to refute
“ The slogans Kosova ‘the Serbian Jerusalem’, ‘Old
Serbia’, ‘the cradle of Serbia’, ‘unchristianized Albanians’, etc. are a
mythological arsenal of the anti-Albanian propaganda, by which the Serbian
century long albanophobia has been emphasized.”(
www.albanur.net, ibid.).
M.Isakov: “Creating a state for Kosovo could be a first step toward joining it
with the Albanian state - that was Hitler's solution. Only during the Hitler
period did a so-called Greater Albania exist, and only during the Nazi regime
was Kosovo treated as a separate region by itself, named New Albania. “
Miodrag Isakov’s fourth mistake is really shameful,
misjudgment and mistrial because of the fact that he has connected Kosova and
Albania
with “Hitler’s solution” of existing of “Gerater
Albania”?!
– This allusion is a big untruth as a product of Serbian
anti-Albanian propaganda that Kosova doesn’t exist ever as a part of ethnic
Albania’s
integral territory, but only “during the Hitler period did a so-called
Greater
Albania…”
I must assert that neither during Hitler’s
period of the Second Worl War nor before in history of Albanians didn’t exist
any “Greater Albania” in Balkans , but Ethnic Albania only which dated from
Illyrians historical period.
Why M.
Isakov mentions “Hitler’s solution” in this case? – Because he knows that
Jews people with full right is allergic to the Hitler’s
genocide committed to them. But, this allusion to Albanians
toward Serbs it doesn’t make sense because of that that Serbs
have been like fascists toward Albanians and Jews people as
well as (1844-2008). Through up to now their history, Albanian
have never did any terror, genocide or holocaust against Serbs
or the other neighbor countries or the other people. But Serbs are that
people who with their governments did several genocide toward
Albanians and have conquered their ethnic territories such as
Kosova, Presheva, Bujanoci, Medvegja, Novi Pazar/Tregu i Ri/, Vranja,
Kushumlija, Bllaca, Piroti etj. In a ward, Great Serbia and Serbs proved
themselves toward Albanians and
Albania
like Hitler and his fascist
Germany
splitting, colonizing and annexing them and their indigenous territories of
Ethnic Albania (not at all “Great Albania” which is derived as a
propagandistic and political product military weapon of Great Serbia ever
after 1844 to 2008.
Historically,
Albania
and Albanians have had very good friendship relations with Jews , as long as
with Serbs ones had very bad and tragic relation because
Serbia
did genocide to them during Second World War. According to famous Croatian
historian and publicist : “Ljubica
Stefan retired professor: refugee from Belgrade where she lived for 30 years,
researches genocide against Albanians, anti-Semitism and persecution of Jews,
as well as the behavior of Serbia and the Serbian Orthodox Church in World War
II.”(
http://www.hic.hr/books/seeurope/014e-stefan.htm).
Even though,
methodically is not preferred to be cited all article or text
of cited authors, in this case we did that in order to convince
the Serbian ambassador in Tel Aviv that Serbs are that people who have
discriminated Jews in Serbia like Hitler’s fascist and Gestapo, the Serbs are
that people who discriminate and occupied Albanians applying
terror and genocide on them; Serbs look like Hitler’s fascist and
Gestapo against Albanians in Kosova, and other ethnic their territories, not
Albanians against Serbs such is “described” in his article Serbian ambassador
Miodrag Isakov in Tel Aviv in “The Jerusalem Post”, 12.12.2007.
Rightly, by this explicit
historical studying of Ljubica Stefan we can see that the Serbs
there were fascist enemies toward Serbian
Jews and Albanians too like their government during the Second World War, not
Albanians at all.
By Ljubica
Stefan:
“ANTI-SEMITISM IN
SERBIA
DURING THE WORLD WAR II
There are still some
significant historical facts about
Serbia
before and during the Second World War which remain suppressed or are even
distorted with prejudice, not only in
Serbia
but also abroad. We believe this to be the consequence of ignorance due to the
energetic, and unfortunately successful, propaganda of
Yugoslavia
and
Serbia
these past fifty years. Thus, these facts should always be pointed out in a
precise and detailed manner whenever this dark period is mentioned, which is,
in effect, only just one such period in a series of similar centuries-old ones
in Serbian history.
Until today,
Serbia
has worn a heroes halo in a land of martyrs as a member of the anti-Hitler
coalition and an alleged contributor to the victory in the Second World War.
This is completely untrue.
Serbia
was not an unfortunate occupied land subjected to German terror. During the
entire war,
Serbia
was the most faithful ally to the Third Reich on European territory under its
domination. As opposed to all the other countries of the former
Yugoslavia,
there was no organized, and an even less massive, armed anti-Hitler movement.
When
England
finally ceased supporting and exalting Draza Mihajlovic, even Radio London,
according to the Serbian press, had Mr. Harrison direct the following warning:
"It is up to the Serbs to brighten their reputation and cleanse their
blemishes. Serbs, remember! The Greater Serbian hegemony will never return.
The other nations in
Yugoslavia
have been exploited enough by the Serbs. You are being given one more
opportunity to save yourselves. There has been enough dawdling and enjoyment
on the part of the Serbs while other nations have been fighting."
Serbia
was a real state during World War II. It consisted of the following: a
government, organized ministries, independent authorities in towns and
villages, its own army which was armed by the Germans, and this Nedic’s
Serbian State Guard, the Serbian Guard, the elite Ljotic�s
Serbian Voluntary Corps, the Serbian Border Guard, the Serbian Country Guard,
as well as numerous Cetnik units. Within the Ministry of Internal affairs
there was a large, well-organized and well-trained Serbian police force, with
numerous prisons, customs services and special police schools. Elementary and
secondary schools were in function in the towns and villages. Many newspapers
and magazines were being printed as well as a large number of books. New
theaters and cinemas were being built. Museums were open. Art shows and
concerts were organized. New laws and statutes passed by the Serbian
government were published in the "Official Gazette". The Serbian National
Bank, with a Serbian governor at its head, printed new Serbian money with an
exchange rate in relation not only to the German mark but also to other
significant European currency including the kuna. Ancient Serbian flags were
hoisted everywhere and the national coat of arms was emphasized. Kosovo and
the divine Knez Lazar were celebrated, St. Sava and the Karadjordjevic dynasty
were exulted, etc. Until the very final moment, the Serbians believed that
they would be rewarded with the creation of a Greater Serbia after Hitler�s
victory!
Anti-Semitism was,
along with the militant, conquering, genocidal Orthodoxy of St. Sava, one of
the constant ideologies and politics of the Serbian Orthodox Church before,
during and after the Second World War. This is in effect even today. That is
to say, the Serbian Orthodox Church (SPC) is in fact a kind of political
party. It is greater Serbian and even racist. Pastoral work has been
completely neglected.
Anti-Semitism began
to spread in
Serbia
before the Second World War. The Fascist Party "Zbor", Dimitrij Ljotic,
prominent Church dignitaries, as well as the church press, were the main
generators of the expansion of anti-Semitism. Ljotic roused the Serbian
population with the following types of statements: "The Jewish people use the
explosives in their hearts to destroy Christian communities and lead them to
their ruin"; "The destructive action of the Jewish spirit may be felt in all
domains of human life"; "Judaism is appearing as a cultural and national
danger, which we must be free of as soon as possible". Ljotic�s
model and idol was the leader of the Third Reich. He praised him in the
following manner: "Hitler is the instrument of God�s
providence. He is an instrument which can no longer be stopped until his
assigned mission has been fully completed." A great number of Orthodox priests
were very active members of "Zbor". The most prominent was the main ideologist
of Orthodoxy and anti-Semitism in the Serbian church, episcopate Nikolaj
Velimirovic who had been decorated by Hitler already in 1934. It was probably
in gratitude that he wrote the following in his book about St. Sava in 1935: "
We must regard with esteem the present German leader who, in the twentieth
century, came up with the idea of St. Sava and as a layman took upon himself a
task for his people as befits only a holy man, a genius and a hero." Several
years later, in 1939, he publicly preached racism: " We are people of an Aryan
race, which fate has given an honorary role... so that tribes of weaker races
and inferior faiths will not...". In the "Glasnik Srpske pravoslavne
Patrijarsije" (Gazette of the Serbian Orthodox Patriarchate), letters about
Jewish people such as the following were common: "Jews are enemies, sly as
snakes and dangerous". The same newspaper reported the following statement
given by Patriarch Varnava to a German newspaper in 1937. "The Führer, is
leading a battle which will benefit mankind", "God has sent the German people,
a führer with foresight. We believe his truthful words". Sometime before this
Varnava referred to the Soviet government as a "deceiving Jewish gang".
Germany
attacked
Yugoslavia
on
April 6, 1941,
and without battle on April 12 its army had already entered
Belgrade
which had been abandoned by the Yugoslav Army and by all authorities since the
first day of the war. The unconditional surrender was signed by the generals
of the King�s
Army on April 17.
On the actual day of
the German arrival, Milicevic, the Governor of Belgrade, informed the citizens
on a posted notice that the Serbian army was already organized and armed.
Several days later, Dragi Jovanovic became the Governor (he held this title
until the end of the war), the Chief of the Serbian police, and later the
Chief of Serbian Security. The following statement made by SS General Harald
Turner, only a month after his arrival in
Belgrade,
proves the unlimited power of the Serbian police: "I attempted to re-establish
the activity of the police system with particular haste. Today, executive
power in
Serbia
is carried out by the police and gendarmes who have been given weapons...
internal relations are regulated by local organs without German interference."
Dragi Jovanovic himself stated in a report to the Gestapo: "Occupying forces
were always able to rely on the
Belgrade
police. Special Police forces dealt with their assignments with great
enthusiasm and success, unlike any other police in any city in all of occupied
Europe".
In 1946, at his trial in
Belgrade,
he added: "These results were better and greater than the results of the
Gestapo itself in
Belgrade."
For the first four
months, Milan Acimovic was at the head of
Serbia
with his Council of Commissars and then, General Milan Nedic, former Minister
of the Yugoslavian Army, who had a pro-German and anti-Semitic orientation,
took over the leadership in
Serbia.
Owing to the wholehearted cooperation of all Serbian authorities and the
police with the Germans, SS-man Harald Turner, stated the following in 1942: "
Serbia
is a nation in which the problem of Jews and Gypsies has been solved." Franz
Rademacher of the Nazi Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported: "The Jewish
problem in
Serbia
is no longer acute. The only thing left is to solve the legal questions
concerning property." The chief of the German Security Service in Serbia, A.
Schafer bragged: "Belgrade - the only larger European city which is cleansed
of Jews, has become �Judenfrei.�"
Let us be reminded of the historical fact that Serbia ingloriously took first
place in the genocide against the Jews in Europe just three months after the
meeting of Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the German Security Service, Heinrich
Muller, chief of the Gestapo and Adolf Eichmann, chief of the Special
Department for Jews, which was held on January 20, 1942, at Lake Wansee by
Berlin when the decision was made to approach the " final solution to the
Jewish problem". Specifically, at the end of April and the beginning of May of
that year, the remaining Jews were killed in the Sajmiste concentration
camp...
Until now, the
Holocaust in
Serbia
has been an unspoken topic, a taboo. Jewish and Serbian sources offer
relatively little data, mostly fragmented. What really happened, nevertheless,
may be seen. The following was noted: "Only seven days after their arrival in
Belgrade,
the Germans announced that all Jews had to register themselves at Tasmajdan
(Serbian Police Headquarters). Before then, they had already formed a special
police force for Jewish people, with the help of the police, that is, the
Civil Government of Belgrade. Every Jew received a yellow band." Another
source stated that "Jude" was written on the first bands and had the "stamp of
Belgrade�s
Governor". On one original preserved band (from a later time, it appears),
"Jude" is written in German and "Jevrejin" is written in Cyrillic. The
following data was found as well: "The Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs,
who always endeavored to deal with all their responsibilities on time, dealt
with the Jewish problem, as well". Also: "From among local traitors, the
Gestapo trained the "Special Police" to battle against Jewish-Communistic
actions. The special police closely collaborated with the Gestapo and was
often the initiator of joint actions. The employees of the police were paid
from a fund in which Belgrade Jews were forced to pay 1,400,000 dinars.
Rewards for captured or killed Jews were paid from this fund as well..." By
May 1941, German authorities had already announced the order by which "Jews
were to register with Serbian police authorities", "they cannot be public
servants, they must immediately be eliminated by Serbian authorities", so they
were further forbidden to pursue a series of independent professions, to go to
the theater or cinema, etc. Serbian authorities were declared "responsible for
the carrying out of the order" which they immediately set out to do with in a
conscientious and thorough manner, with the wholehearted approval of the
press. Along with this, they rejoiced in the newspaper at the time: "Jews will
never again be doctors, pharmacists, lawyers or judges in
Serbia.
The Serbs have finally opened their eyes". Dragi Jovanovic, the Serbian
Ministry of Justice, even the Musicians�
Associations and others, immediately proclaimed their own regulations that
Jews turn in all radios and refrigerators even threatening citizens who might
be hiding the property of their Jewish friends or providing them with
unregistered shelter. They ordered the closing of all Jewish lawyers�
offices appointing Serbians in their places. They prohibited Jews to travel on
Belgrade
streetcars and refused work licenses to Jewish musicians and others. In
keeping with the battle for a pure Aryan race, the newspapers started to
publish employment offers which had as one of their first stipulations: "that
they be of pure Aryan race, without Jewish or gypsy blood". Confirmation of
this racial purity was issued by the local Serbian authorities. Nedic�s
"Ministerial Council" published the following order: "Property of the Jews who
were citizens of the former
Kingdom
of
Yugoslavia
on
April 15, 1941,
belongs to
Serbia
if it is on Serbian territory, without any compensation". The Serbian Council
for the Management of Properties of Serbia of the National Mortgage Bank would
then put the properties up for auction, placing an advertisement in the daily
papers. The synagogue in
Nis,
which is now a part of the city museum, was among the properties listed. The
Jews also had to pay a sum of 4,834,231 dinars to Belgrade�s
Civil Government and a million dinars to the
Belgrade
municipality. According to a Jewish source, Serbians made up 33% of the buyers
of Jewish properties! Some "deserving" Serbians, received, as a reward, a part
of the looted Jewish money. The Gestapo Major Karl Krauss, ordered:
"commencing
July 1, 1941,
every month until further notice, a sum of 10,000 dinars will be paid, without
receipts, to Belgrade�s
Police Chief and a sum of 6,000 dinars to his assistant from money collected
from Jews in
Belgrade".
Other than this, the Gestapo rewarded approximately 30 members of the Special
Police with 10 to 20,000 dinars.
The physical
liquidation of Serbian Jews began immediately in the spring of 1941. Almost
all the men were killed by the autumn and the women and children and the
remaining men were liquidated at the end of April and the beginning of May,
1942. The exact number of people killed is not known even from Jewish sources.
Historian Jasa Romano, however, has come to the conclusion that 88% of all
Serbian Jews were killed. The Serbian historian Sretenije Zrokic says that of
the 11,870 Belgrade Jews only 1,115 or 9% survived the war. It was not only
the Germans who captured and killed the Jews in
Serbia,
rather it was the Serbian Police, Nedic�s
volunteers and Cetniks. Most were killed in the Sajmiste and Banjica
concentration camps. Not a single Jew managed to escape from the camps.
The Banjica camp in
Belgrade
was established in July 1941 and shut down at the end of September 1944, a
month before the withdrawal of the Germans from
Belgrade.
At a meeting between the Serbian Police and members of the Gestapo in June
1941, it was decided that one of the barracks of the former Yugoslav Army in
Belgrade�s
suburbs be transformed into a concentration camp. Dragi Jovanovic signed the
document to this effect and the first prisoners were brought in on May 9.
Svetozar Vujkovic was appointed director of the Serbian part of the camp where
there were only Serbian police. The smaller German part was directed by
members of the Gestapo. The commander of the camp and along with his assistant
were German. The German and Serbian parts of the camps were completely
separate.
The prisoners were
watched by heavily armed guards: "Machine guns and reflectors were set up on
the roofs. Day and night, double guards made up of one SS-man and a gendarme
from the Special Police stood watch. Later when the police gained the trust of
the occupier, the German guards were withdrawn". The same Serbian source also
said: "The camp management apparatus was also made up of prison wardens,
headed by their commander, who had been chosen from the ranks of former
gendarmes, now members of the Serbian guard."
From partially
preserved documents of the Serbian part of the camp we learn that 23,697
people were registered and 3,489 were executed by a firing squad. The German
and Serbian police began, at the end of 1943, to destroy the documentation and
to excavate and burn the executed bodies so that it is actually not known how
many victims perished, nor how many were Jews, Serbs or others. The only thing
that is known for certain is: not one Jew left Banjica alive... They were
killed along with the other prisoners in the camp yard, shot down in the
village
of
Jajinci
at the foot of Avala, at the Jewish and the central cemetery in
Belgrade.
The Gestapo, the Special Police, and the Serbian National Guard performed the
executions together. All the lists found were handwritten in Cyrillic. The
prisoners were sent to the camps by the Belgrade Civil Government, the heads
of the Serbian municipal police, the Serbian National Guard, Ljotic�s
volunteer units, Serbian court-martials, and by regional and district leaders
throughout Serbia. Execution lists were drawn up by the Special Police, the
camp chief, Vujkovic, the Gestapo commander and his assistant. From the few
preserved lists, it can be observed that even children were executed: 22 under
the age of 7; 26 under the age of 14; 76 under the age of 17; even mothers
with small children in their arms.
Belgrade
grave-diggers recall: "Members of the Gestapo and Special Police agents would
draw women out of armored cars, one by one. Two men would hold each one by the
arms and the third would shoot her in the head and then push her into the
grave." A Jewish source stated: " From 1942 up to September 1944, Jews, who
had found refuge in some villages in Serbia, were brought to the Banjica camp
after being caught by Ljotic�s
and Nedic�s
men, as well as by Cetniks and handed over to the Germans for which they
received financial rewards."
The only surviving
Jews in
Serbia
were those who remained unexposed in remote Serbian villages where peasants
were hiding them. In a written report after the war, one of the surviving Jews
said the following " Draza Mihailovic�s
Cetniks, mercilessly pursued Jews in that region, especially the Cetnik units
that came from Ravna Gora (Draza�s
main headquarters), whom we were forced to hide from just as we had to hide
from the Germans. I know that it was these Cetniks who killed several families
in that region in the most appalling manner."
The majority of
Serbian Jews were killed in the Sajmiste camp. There is no precise information
and documentation is almost non-existent, yet it is estimated that the number
of victims comes to at least 11,000. The camp was formed on the left bank of
the
Sava
by the railway bridge at the entrance into
Belgrade
where the pre-war trade fair was located. This is where the name Sajmiste
originated. This territory which was, at that time, deserted, uninhabited and
marshy, was several kilometers from Zemun and formed a part of NDH
(Independent State of Croatia) territory, so the Germans asked for it to be
given to them. It is, however, completely untrue that this was an Ustasa camp
which Serbian propaganda claims even today. Not one Ustasa ever entered the
camp. The commander, Androfer, and his assistant, were SS-men. On Gestapo
ruling, order and discipline were maintained by the
Camp
Council
which was comprised exclusively of camp inmates who were at first solely Jews
because there were no others and some agents of the Serbian police. Supplies
were provided by the "Department of Social Care and Social Institutions of
Belgrade�s
Municipal Authorities". At the beginning of December 1941, Serbian gendarmes
called upon Jews in
Belgrade
to report to the Special Police and to hand over their house keys. The
transfer of Jews, primarily women and children, lasted from December 8 until
12. Conditions in the camp were extremely difficult - the damp and the cold,
hunger and epidemics. A Jewish source says: "The food was appalling and often
not even the minimal amount of food was supplied. In Nedic�s
units there were people who were no better than the Germans themselves." What
is almost unbelievable is that even the camp�s
German commander protested against the quantity of supplies. The reply of
Belgrade�s
Municipal Authorities to the Germans was just as unbelievable if not insolent:
"Provisions for the Jewish camp will be carried out once all other needs are
met."
As camp inmates
starved and froze to death, they were transferred over the frozen
Sava
to
Belgrade
where they were buried. Many (the number is unknown) were led away to be shot
by firing squads in
Belgrade.
They were killed in the same manner, in the same place and by the same people
as were the Banjica prisoners. Some were killed by the Germans in a special
gas truck on their way to
Belgrade
and buried in Jajinci but their number is not known. A Serbian company "Obnova"
purchased the clothes of those. Some were led away to camps in other countries
(numbers and destination are unknown). When the number of imprisoned Jews
began to decrease, Serbian prisoners and others began to arrive. One of these
prisoners recalls: "The criminals were the same as those in Banjica. The
commanders were also the same - Germans, Nedic�s
men and other Serbian fascists". According to some data, all Jews in that camp
were liquidated before
May 9, 1942.
Belgrade
had become "Judenfrei"....
Another surviving
Serbian camp inmate, wrote in his book of memoirs: "Several thousand Jews
passed through the Sajmiste camp... Long lines of sad histories were written
on the walls of the pavilions and in many places artistic portraits were
completed. For days we returned to these final traces of thousands of people.
There were surviving Serbians who told us various details about the life of
the Jews in Sajmiste and who had allowed the Jews to write their final parting
thoughts and vows ." Today, there is not a trace of these words at Sajmiste.
Which of the "liberators" erased, destroyed and eradicated their every trace?
Consequently, in the pavilions that remain today, consisting of offices and
warehouses, there is not even a small plaque commemorating that this was the
scene of a horrific concentration camp for Jews. On
February 11, 1993,
the European parliament adopted the Resolution on European and International
Protection of Concentration Camps as Historical Monuments. But it seems this
does not pertain to
camp
Sajmiste.
Sajmiste, the largest Jewish execution camp in
Serbia,
is not even listed among the names of the 22 largest camps for Jews in
Europe
in the Memorial Center Jad Vashem in the Hall of Memoirs in
Jerusalem.
Of all the camps in the former
Yugoslavia,
Jasenovac is the only name listed! Does this intentionally imply that all
Serbian Jews were apparently killed in the NDH in Jasenovac?
* * *
Finally, how did the
Serbian Orthodox Church (SPC) act during World War II? Not one word of
condemnation of the genocide, the yellow bands, the concentration camps or the
racism was ever heard from them. Immediately upon the arrival of the Germans,
representatives of the Holy Synod paid homage to the German military commander
and stated, first in print and then in person: " The Holy Orthodox Synod will
loyally carry out the laws and commands of the occupying and territorial
authorities and will, through its organs, endeavour to effect the complete
abidance of order, peace and obedience." The synod remained loyal to their
promise until the end and it never violated its promise given to the "father
of
Serbia"
General Milan Nedic that "the Serbian Orthodox Church will, in the spirit of
St. Sava�s
Orthodox tradition, continue to fight on his side". There are no known cases
of any Serbian Orthodox priest saving the life or attempting to save the life
of one Jew, although some of them often openly expressed anti-Semitic
attitudes in their sermons, instigating their congregation against Jews.
Metropolitan Josif, as the head of the Serbian church during war time, signed
orders that Jews be forbidden to transfer to the Orthodox faith, even though
this would have saved them. Three episcopates were the first to sign the
"Appeal to the Serbian people" of August 1941, in which over 500 of the
intellectual elite of
Serbia
publicly expressed their support of the occupiers and quislings, which was a
unique case in war-affected
Europe.
* * *
One clear
manifestation of Serbian anti-Semitism was the anti-Masonic, specifically the
anti-Jewish exhibition which opened in
Belgrade
on
October 22, 1941
and which was to support and justify the genocide against the Jews in
Serbia
and in
Europe.
Apart from the exhibits at the show, an overwhelming amount of propaganda
material was prepared (over 200,000 various brochures, 60,000 posters, 100,000
leaflets, 108,000 copies of nine different post cards, 176 various cinema
advertisements, four types of postal stamps, etc.). The organizers boasted:
"Such a conceived exhibition will be unique, not only in
Serbia
but in the Balkans as well, not only in south-eastern
Europe
and
Europe,
but in the world". The press awakened the national pride of the people: "The
success of the
Belgrade
exhibition has surpassed Serbia�s
borders and received deserved recognition by the press in entire
Europe".
The pride of the organizers was directed to a truly unique occurrence in
Europe during the war, this being the anti-Jewish stamps which showed
abominable racist drawings, and which were to, according to requests by
Serbian anti-Semites, "in the entire world, for all time, serve as the most
convincing evidence of how one nation awakened when faced with the danger of
disappearing(?)". Milan Nedic expressed "his complete gratitude to the
organizers and believes that the exhibition will have a great educational
impact, because it systematically displays, in a clear manner, the work of the
enemy of the nation and the people".
* * *
Much time has passed
since what has been described in
Serbia,
but anti-Semitism in
Serbia,
like the vampire, does not die. In 1985, the Serbian eparchy in
Western
Germany
printed a book in Serbian and in Cyrillic written by the already deceased
episcopate, Nikolai Velimirovic, supposedly in 1945 in the
Dachau
camp. The fact that this is completely untrue is another theme. The book
preaches to the Serbian Orthodox people: "Today,
Europe
is primarily the battlefield of the Jews and the father of the Jewish devil.
Europe
is not aware of this and in this lies the dark tragedy of its peoples.
Europeans, Christians and the anointed, have completely surrendered themselves
to the Jews. They think as the Jewish people do, they have adopted Jewish
programs, accepted Jewish lies as the truth, they travel the same paths as
Jews and they serve Jewish goals". There was no reaction from either side. In
1991, the Serbian Orthodox Church organized the spectacular transfer to
Serbia
of the remains of this anti-Semitic ideologist. The newsletter of the Serbian
patriarchy "Pravoslavlje" printed an article in January 1992 by their
correspondent in
Israel
"Jews Crucify Christ Once More", with the following allegations: "Many
Israelis are sick with hatred for the Christians. The hatred is open among the
ordinary people. Politicians are perfidious and work in secret.", etc. etc...
Two weeks later, the Holy Orthodox Synod announced that the text " sounds
anti-Semitic, things are carelessly reported" and at the same time claimed:
"the phenomenon of anti-Semitism and anti-Judaism is completely alien to the
tradition and history of the Serbian Orthodox Church". In February 1992, the
Belgrade
"Borba" wrote that at the entrance to the Jewish cemetery, someone had
written: "Death to Jews and all Jewish p....", but the whole affair was
covered up. The "Tanjug" news agency announced a few days later that "the
Jewish lobby had arranged the diplomatic recognition of
Croatia
and
Slovenia
by
Russia".
One of Seselj�s
commanders stated in
Subotica
that the property of Jews (and Croats) should be confiscated. In August 1993,
the president of the Jewish community in
Belgrade,
commenting on their relations with the Orthodox Church, stated in a
conversation with Zagreb Jews that the Orthodox Church "still preaches deicide
and is still streaked with anti-Semitism". Two months ago, in an Israeli
newspaper, we learn that "a member of the Serbian parliament has accused the
Jews of stabbing
Serbia
in the back".
It seems as if the "Borba"
journalist was correct when he concludes his article with the following words:
" Propagandistic platitudes on the non-existence of anti-Semitism in
Serbia
do not correspond to reality: there has always been anti-Semitism in
Serbia".
It is true, history
does not repeat itself in
Serbia,
it merely continues in a uninterrupted series...
As do certain
statements made by Serbian intellectuals, for instance: "it is a propaganda
lie that Serbians liquidated Jews during the Second World War and that
anti-Semitism was present in
Serbia
before the war and is present now!" This statement was made by Dr. Ljubo Tadic�s,
a professor of the Faculty of Arts in
Belgrade
and a Serb, and Dr. Andrija Gams, professor at the Faculty of Law, sadly, a
Serbian Jew.”(Source: ://www.hic.hr/books/seeurope/014e-stefan.htm).
Mr. Serbian
ambassador Miodrag Isakov in Tel Aviv to get more historical, political and
diplomatic acknowledge about Albanians and Kosova, respectively Ethnic Albania
in Balkans could read as following my additional essay which is
published last year in some Albanians and English mass-media.
Lastly, my
suggestion to Serbian ambassador in Israel, Miodrag Isakov is
:- Mr. ambassador don’t try to manipulate and speculate with Israel people,
and to poise them with your Serbian genocide propaganda against Albanians
because Israel and its people have sufficient historical,
political and diplomatic knowledge about Albanians, Kosova and Albania in
Balkans.
By Mehdi HYSENI,
Ph.D.
HISTORY AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, YES FULL
INDEPENDENCE
OF ALBANIAN KOSOVA!
ABSTRACT: Kosova is
colonial, not minority “new issue” ( arise from 1990 when SFRY was destroyed
by Slobodan Milosevic’s genocide and militarist
Serbia)
as Serbian government and Serbian Orthodox Church are trying to manipulate
with it in the face of the international community. However, the historical
truth is that Kosova was under colonial rule of Serbia, respectively the
Kingdom of Yugoslavia ( Serbs, Croats and Slovens) /1918-1941/, the Socialist
Federative Republic of Yugoslavia(1945-1990) , and the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) /1990-2006/. As a result of the colonial,
genocide and annexation rule of Yugoslavia, respectively Serbia on Kosova and
the another indigenous territories of the Ethnic Albania (1912- 1999),
Albanian people and Ethnic Albania separated in two parts in favor of the
enlargement of the Serbia’s territory. This is the main cause why Kosova had
struggled through centuries/1878-1999/ to realize its the right of the
self-determination and full independence from
Serbia.
In this context
ought to act rightly, legally and democratically the main factors of the
international community (USA, OUN, EU, NATO etc.) to resolve the final status
of Albanian Kosova. Regarding to this important universal and principle
approach of Kosova’s colonial problem, the author of this essay was obliged to
make one thing absolutely clear: Without granting of the external
self-determination to Kosova, there’s no doubt that Balkans cooperation,
security and peace will remain fragile and dangerous not only for the Balkans
peoples, but also for European Union, and in the wide sense.
Otherwise, every
another approach (such is decentralization which theoretically and practically
means disintegration of the integral native territory of Kosova in favor of
the Serbian colonist minority(8%) will be in the deepest contradiction with
international law, and the UN charter. If the international community want to
bring together different peoples with diversity history, culture and
civilization in this case it must respect the right of the self-determination
to all of them which still haven’t get their independence from their colonized
regimes such as the drastic case of the
Serbia
with its colony of Albanian Kosova.
All of us should be
aware that multiethnic, integrated and pluralist societies within Europe and
all of the world too, can be create in the real sense, if we apply the same
international norms and standards(not double, or different ones). Also, “The
new world order can only be realized if all states, large and small, respect
the United Charter.” (Robert Jackson, The Global Covenant-Human Conduct in a
World States, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000, p.3).
At first, I must
confess that as all of the Albanian people inside the Ethnic Albania, and in
diaspora too, I also as an inalienable part of one, appraise at high level
with respect and devotion all of up to now attempts (political, diplomatic,
economical, humanitarian and military) of the United States of America,
managed and governed by the state administration of the ex-president Bill
Clinton and the actual president George W. Bush in revival, life-saving and
universal protection ( moral, humanitarian, democratic, legal etc.) of
Albanian people and Kosova. But, being that this is very important historical
moment as well as the last chance to resolve properly the final status Kosova
according to the external self-determination, particularly the United States
and the United Nations need to take into account historical right and
International Law, not heterogeneous geopolitics, economics and military
interests of the Europe which morally and legally is responsible for its
unimproved historical and political mistakes toward Albania and Albanians
which did twice through The Congress of Berlin (June 13 - July 13, 1878) and
The London Conference of Ambassadors 1913, dividing them in two parts, and
annexed them to Serbia, Greece and Montenegro.
The historical
background 1878-1999 /briefly/
These indisputable
historical facts prove that origins of the conflict between Serbian and
Albanians aren’t of the new date from Titos Yugoslavia (1945-1989),
respectively from Slobodan Milosevic
Yugoslavia
(Serbia+ Montenegro, 1989-2000), but is very old since 1878; 1912-1913 as we
mentioned above. However, by then up to now Albanians never stopped their
attempts and struggles against Serbian colonial rule and genocide in order to
release themselves and bring back their indigenous territories of the ethnic
Albania.
This our conclusion in favor of the historical and the self- determination of
the Albanians and Kosova witness and follows arguments : (I) Albanian Kosova
has been inhabited by the Illyrians, who are the ancestors of the present day
Albanians who constitute over 90% of its inhabitants, and henceforth must be
rightly called Albanian Kosova. (II) Also, in 1878, Kosova was part of natural
Albania because of this fact in the same year (as a counter-replay to
anti-Albanian resolutions, adopted by the Congress of Berlin) was founded the
Albanian League of Prizren (1878) in sign of the revolt against the Ottomans,
but for a short time it was destroyed by the military intervention of Russia
and the Ottomans, which led the Great Powers’ Congress of Berlin in 1878 to
enable Serbia and Montenegro to steal Albanian lands and to genocide the
Albanians for the second time. That was the Russian intervention in favor of
the
Serbia
and
Montenegro
which destroyed peaceful coexistence in the Balkans and is still destroying
it. (III) Albanian Kosova was a legal part of the independent of
Albania
(November 28, 1912). But it was invaded by military
Serbia
which committed genocide against its indigenous people. The injustice done by
severing Albanian Kosova from its motherland was crowned in the London
Conference of Ambassadors (December 1912- August 1913).(IV) In 1918 Albanian
Kosova was inclusive in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes by force and
genocide, but it was flagrant act of colonialism, dividing Albanian
territories, and giving rise to the Albanian right to the decolonization of
Albanian Kosova. During 1918-1919 Albanian Kosova’s struggle for independence
was crushed through genocide crimes committed for the fourth time by the Serbs
against its indigenous people, including the importation of Serbian colonists
in Kosova, respectively in Ethnic Albania. According to articles 20 and 22.4
of the Covenant of the
League of
Nations, the severance of Albanian Kosova from Ethnic(natural)
Albania
is declared null and void and its independence from the colonizing Power is
provisionally recognized.
In violation of the
Covenant of the
League of
Nations,
Albanian Kosova was colonized in the period 1918-1941 by the
Kingdom
of
Yugoslavia
and was officially declared and treated as a colony, through implanting
Serbian colonists, expelling hundreds of thousands of the indigenous Albanian
people, economic and mental persecution, terror, and liquidation; that is
genocide.
Turkey
took part in that genocide operation be expelling over 300.000 Albanian from
Albanian Kosova to
Istanbul,
according to the Gentlemen Agreement with
Yugoslavia
in 1938.
Being that that
Albanian Kosova it’s not a legal property of Serbia and Serbs, Albanian people
shouldn’t agree with imposition of the “conditional independence “ of Kosova
because one has never been Serbia’s territory, but Ethnic Albania’s integral
natural, historical and geopolitical part. This is the main reason why
Albanians shouldn’t give up from their historical and legitimate right of
Kosova. While, Serbian minority of 8% doesn’t have any legal right to call
upon that Kosova is part of
Serbia,
because one is colonial remnant in Kosova from 1912 when
Serbia
by genocide and military force colonized and annexed Kosova. This our
conclusion proves and Serbian historian Dubravka Stojanovic (Professor at
Philosophic Faculty of Belgrade University) : “For Serbia the First Balkan War
was the greatest historical moment, but for Albanians the same war was the
biggest trauma because of the Great Powers of Europe adopted their unjust
resolution of dividing of Albania in two parts, and Kosovo annexed to Serbia”
(RSE, October 22,2002). Also, as a professor Dubravka Stojanovic was written:
“ In 1912, Serbia, very fast, militarily entered and occupied territory of
Kosovo, Novi Pazar and a part of Macedonia”. (THB1NL (3 Februar, 2007 -
15:54).
These historical
based facts, expounded by Dubravka Stojanovic that Kosova was colonized by
Serbia,
also, are interlaced accurately by prof.dr.Robert
Jackson
: “Kosovo had long been part of the
Ottoman
Empire
when it was conquered by
Serbia
in 1912. That right of conquest was confirmed by the League of the Nations at
the end of the First World War by the inclusion of Kosovo in the new state of
Yugoslavia.”
(Robert Jackson, The Global Covenant- Human Conduct in a World of States,
Oxford
University,
New York,
2000, p.278).
It’s important to
stress the fact that, and during the Second World War the status of Albanians
of Kosova was remained unchanged, even though “in January 2, 1944 was hold the
meeting of the National Liberation Movement about Kosova political status
which as known as the Bujan Conference. In this conference was adopted the
Bujan Resolution, which defined Albanian Kosova as a sovereign entity and a
part of Albania and expressed its aim remain part of the Albanian state after
the end of the Second World War. But the partisan army led by Tito crushed its
indigenous people by committing all possible means of genocide against them.”
(Noel Malcom, Kosovo a Short History, Harper Perennial, New York, 1999,
p.307-308)
After the end of the
war in
Yugoslavia
(1945) in violation, and contrary to the purposes and principles of the United
Nations Charter, according to the
Yugoslavia’s
Federal Constitution of 1946, Albanian Kosova and its indigenous Albanian
people were annexed by force of the
Yugoslavia.
According to the international law, this is an act of colonialism because of
the fact it was against the will of Albanian people. In the same outlaw manner
in 1989 (after Slobodan Milosevic took power in SRFY), Albanian Kosova was
again illegally and by force annexed by the Republic of Serbia, which matter
breaks any structural connection between the two entities, and constitutes the
obstruction of Albanian Kosova’s exercise of its independence, statehood and
sovereignty. This annexation was by force, and the commission of all forms of
total obstruction of the internal self-determination which Albanian Kosova had
according to the constitution of the SFRY in the 1974. As a consequence all of
these mentioned Serbia’s condemnable acts according to the Article 2 (4) of
the United Nations Charter, and the international law, in July2, 1990,
Kosova’s parliament adopted the Declaration of independence of Albanian Kosova;
(2) the Constitution of September 7, 1990 (known as Kacanik’s Constitution)
declaring Albanian Kosova a republic ; (3) the Declaration of September
22,1991 as a sovereign independent state with the right of constitutional
participation in the league of sovereign republic-states of Yugoslavia;(4) the
Declaration of October 19, 1991 of Albanian Kosova as a sovereign independent
republic on the basis of the Referendum held from September 26 through 30,
1991 in the presence of international observers, with 87,01% of the electorate
voting, from which 99,87% voted in favor of independence from the SFRY. This
Referendum was according to the contemporary international law, and the UN
Charter as well as to these resolutions, adopted by the Assembly of the United
Nations: (i) Res.637(VII) Dec.16,1952.Right of Peoples and Nations to Self-
Determination, (ii) Res.1514(XV) Dec.1960 on granting independence to
dependent peoples; (iii) Res.2160 (XXI) Nov.30,1966. Forcible action depriving
people of right to self-determination; (iv) Res. 2200(XXI) Dec.16,1966.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Art.1;
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Art.1.; (v) Res.(XXV)
Nov.30,1970. Emphasizing importance of universal realization of
self-determination and condemning denial especially to people of southern
Africa
and
Palestine;
(vi) Res.33/44 Dec.13,1978. Decolonization; (vii) Res.34/103
Dec 14,1979.
Hegemonism, and so on.
Ahtisari’s plan must
be in compliance with international law, and historical right of Alba- nians
to Kosova
& ;nbs p; All of the
international actors (USA, UN, EU, NATO, Contact Group) involved in settlement
of Kosova’s status, morally and legally are obliged to take into account valid
and objective arguments according to historical and juridical rights of both
parts (Serbian and Albanian) in conflict. Really, in this context is prepared
and the United Nation plan on Kosova which in February 2, 2007 was delivered
and presented by its envoy, Marti Ahtisari to Serbian authorities in Belgrade
and Albanian government in Prishtina. However, Marti Ahtisari’s plan about
Kosova, official
Belgrade
at the same day rejects by motivation that one imply independence of Kosova.
Meanwhile, Albanian part accepted it with reluctance and pleasure hoping that
the UN special envoy Marti Ahtisari will get in consideration its additional
proposals to be completed his plan before submitted it to the Security Council
of the United Nations.
Like Albanian part
in Pristina as well as mentioned relevant parts of international community
(particularly
USA)
who invested, and really interested to resolve of Kosova’s issue needn’t
hurried with approving of Marti Ahtisari’s plane because one "omitted" the
external self-determination of Kosova. This is a main reason why Marti
Ahtisari’s Plan couldn’t be presented to the UN Security Council before being
completed with this important and unavoidable legal clause which is in
conformity to " the Declaration Granting Independence to Colonial Countries
and Peoples and Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning
Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in Accordance with the Charter
of the UN"(See: GA Resolution 1514(XV),14 December 1960; and GA Resolution
2625(XXV),24 October 1970).
These are the main
rational and legal reasons why Kosova must be granted with full-external
independence, not only with internal independence such as Marti Ahtisari’s
Plan expected as a first reasonable step. Indeed, Kosova’s government isn’t in
situation to refuse Marti Ahtisari’s proposed plan, like did Serbia, but
morally, historically and legally is obliged to give its additional suggests
and proposals which concern to the settlement of the final political status of
Kosova in compliance to recognize the full right of the self-determination of
2 millions Albanian people who are the "hostages" of the colonial Great Serbia
from 1912/1913 to June 10, 1999.
In this context,
Marti Ahtisari’s plan must take in consideration and these important
historical and juridical reasons and arguments who are directly connected to
the granting of full independence of Kosova. First, historically, Kosova has
never been legal part of Serbian territory, but only genocidal and colonial
plunder disjoined from the historical, geopolitical and integral territory of
the ethnic natural
Albania
by the European Great Powers (19113).
Second, Kosova
belongs to the civilization (history, culture and language etc.) of the
Western Europe because Albanians are Illyrians descendants, not at all Slaves
or Muslims as Serbian quasi-history, politics and propaganda of the Serbian
State and Orthodox Church try to sophisticate their history for centuries in
the face of the world in order to hide their centennial colonial genocides
committed on Albanians and ethnic Albania (1846-1999).
On the contrary of
the Serbian invented myth about Kosova battle 1389, which symbolize ancient
history and right of
Serbia
and Serbs to Kosova, "Serbia
does not have a continuous history on Kosova. For several hundred years,
Kosova was not part of
Serbia,
because there was no
Serbia
to be part of: during most of long Ottoman period,
Serbia
did not exist as an entity at all. Kosova was annexed de facto by
Serbia
within living memory, in 1912; de jure it wasn’t annexed by the Serbian
kingdom at all".(See excellent book, Introduction : Kosova a Short History by
Neol Malcolm, New York, 1999, p.xxxv). Also,
Serbia
and Serbs haven’t their religious and culture "cradle" in Kosova because "the
seat of the Serbian Orthodox Church was not founded in Kosova; it merely moved
there after its original foundation in central
Serbia
was burnt down. Nor does the Patriarchate have any continuous history as an
institution in Kosova…, but in Rascia(Serbia),
an area beyond Kosova’s north- western border, and most of the important early
medieval Serbian monastires and churches were built outside Kosova itself." (Ibidem,
p. xxxv).
There’s no dilemma
that historically Kosova was Albanian territory, not Serbian as has written
with incontestable arguments Prof.Dr. Noel Malcolm in his mentioned excellent
and realistic book about Kosova. Indeed, that Kosova has never been Serbian
land, but Albanian which in 1371 has been part of the Albanian feudal state of
the Balshas which was defeated by the Ottomans in 1389.
Third, Kosova isn’t
Serbian minority problem (as official
Belgrade
and Serbian Orthodox Church are manipulating with 8% of Serbs in Kosova under
the pretext that they are victims of the Albanian majority of 90%. This is
falls argument which Serbia, and Serbian Orthodox Church are using to blame
Albanians, instead to blame themselves for all their colonial aggressions and
genocides toward Kosova- Albania and Albanians ), but ancient colonial problem
which must be resolved in accordance with International Positive Law and the
United Nations Chart. Fourth, in order to reach definitely political
compromise between Serbs and Albanians, Marti Ahtisari’s plan must include the
necessary international juridical clause of the external self- determination
which theoretically and practically means full independence of Kosova, not
internal which directly and indirectly Belgrade want to be implied to Kosova
by international community because it will be only "legal way" to keep still
its colonial plunder like 100 years ago (1878-2007).
Basically, Marti
Ahtisari’s plan about final status of Kosova should be accepted by Pristina’s
government and Albanian political parties, only if it contains the full
external independence of Kosova, otherwise won’t be changed the status quo of
Kosova, event though Marti Ahtisari’s plan expect conditional independence of
Kosova under international oversee i.e. the European Union (EU) which
(politically) could consider as a first "equilibrate" and "fair" step by the
international community, it won’t be a good guaranty in the service of
international legality for peace and justice for all.
As the United States
as well as the United Nations, European Union, NATO etc. should bear in mind
the fact that only way to reach historical compromise between disputed parts,
and lasting peace and stability in Balkans is immediately recognition of the
external self-determination of Kosova as a independent, sovereign, democratic
and multiethnic state within which will be include and respect the rule of law
and all human rights to the all ethnic and religious minorities.
* Author is Ph.D. in
International Relations.

ESSAY
By Mehdi Hyseni, Ph.D.*
Saturday, January 12, 2008
The
Black-Colonial Serbian ResolutionAgainst Idependence of Kosova
*** Anatole France : “Change is the essence of
life”
*** But, the meaning of this
philosophical maxim is not apprehensible and acceptable
for
Serbia
and Serbs collective political and national paranoia.
In this context we should understand and last
the Serbian Parliament New Resolution on Kosova which
reflects the essence of the unchanged face
of the old-black Serbian colonialism and imperialism in
native territories of the Ethnic Albania in Balkans.
There’s no doubt that the new Resolution on Kosova,
adopted by Serbian Parliament(December 26,2007) has the same meaning
such as all the other previous resolutions, declarations
and constitutions on Kosova approved by Serbian Government and Parliament
during period of 1989 to 2008.
I must emphasize that the main goal and message of
this new resolution against Kosovo’s independence is in favor of
the protection of colonial sovereignty, and age-old imperialism of the Greater
Serbia on Albanian Kosova, respectively Ethnic Albania, in attempting to
“justify historical right” and “international law”(according to
the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 on Kosovo)
that “ Kosovo-Metohija is Integral Part of Republic of Serbia.”(See:
www.byzantinesacredart.com, “
Serbian Parliament adopts Kosovo-Metohija
Resolution for Defense of state sovereignty and territorial integrity.
December 26, 2007.”).
As above-metioned the new Serbian Resolution
against Kosova’s independence, we cannot appraise
only as “black paper of Serbian nationalism” as it qualified
Albanian prime minister Sali Berisha answering to a journalist question
regarding that issue at press conference in Tirana capital city
of Albania on December 27, 2007(www.lajmet.net,12.28.07)
, but it is the serial repetitious attestation of the traditional doctrine
and practice of the old age-long colonialism rule of Great Serbia on Albanian
Kosova, and other indigenous territories of the Ethnic Albania (not at all
“Greater Albania” because of the fact that term is embryo and
invent of Great Serbia since 1844 up today.
Ethnic
Albania
is not “Geater Albania”!
In an interview with Epoka e Re daily, Albanian
analyst Koco Danaj rightly says that the process of reunification of the
Albanians within the boundaries of a state of their own called Ethnic Albania
is inevitable (perhaps even before 2013). Ethnic
Albania
is not the "Greater Albania" of the political and diplomatic circles of
official
Serbia
headed by Foreign Minister Draskovic.
Despite all the disinformation and the biased
anti-Albanian interpretation of the Albanian analyst's statement on the part
of Serbian Foreign Minister Draskovic and the TANJUG news agency, its terse
and clear message must have been understood not only by the chauvinist and
neo-colonialist circles of Serbian official politics but also by those in
Montenegro, Greece, and Macedonia, because unless the problem of the colonial
status of the Albanians living in these artificial states is resolved, there
can be no security and peace in the Balkans.
Looking at problems in their historical, political,
and juridical aspects, Danaj comes to the objective conclusion that the
colonizing Serbian-Slav states (Serbia,
Montenegro,
Greece,
and
Macedonia)
are "unnatural creations," that is, artificial state structures set up on
territories belonging to the Albanians and to ethnic
Albania.
The Albanians and their international allies know this historical truth full
well. Draskovic, the pessimistic Serbian "George Orwell," had
predicted as early as 2002 the natural disintegration of artificial Greater
Serbia!
Hence, Draskovic has no valid reason to oppose the
predictions made by Koco Danaj, who says that within a few years (no later
than 2013) all the Albanians living in the Balkans will be reunited in their
natural state -- Ethnic Albania. This statement must not be understood or
interpreted according to the tyrannical bandit-like whims of the Serbian-Slav
colonialist and hegemony-seeking strategy, or seen as utopian, because in the
very near future the Albanians of all Balkan countries will be reunited within
the borders of Ethnic Albania. Whether Draskovic, Tadic,
Kostunica, the "Black Angels" of the Serbian Orthodox Church, and the
neighboring colonialist states like it or not, this is bound to happen. In
other words, the populations and territories grabbed by the Serbian,
Montenegrin, Macedonian, and Greek imperialists will -- in a peaceful and
legitimate manner -- be restored to Ethnic Albania, not "Greater Albania," as
the distorted science, politics, and propaganda of Greater Serbia keeps
saying, having concocted "Greater Albania" to further its expansionist and
militarist ends in the Balkans, a fiction that, according to the needs and the
political developments in the region and beyond it, is wielded as a "modern
weapon" to oppose and even deny the historical truth of the ethnic,
territorial, and state existence of the Albanians in the Balkans.
Only those politicians who have always been on the side of colonialist
and genocidal
Serbia
and the Serbian-Slav "Little Entente" in its Balkan dimension can fail to see
that. Moreover, the head of Serbian diplomacy himself predicted the reunion
and independence of the Albanians in their ethnic state as early as four years
ago (2002), stressing: "Kosova and Metohia will become independent states, or
more precisely will form Greater Albania. As a result, Bujanovac,
Medvedja, and Presevo will in effect be left outside Serbia, which means that
Greater Albania will knock at Vranje's door" (www.antic.org 30 June 2002).
However, Vuk Draskovic, Serbia, Montenegro, Greece,
and Macedonia have no reason to be "frightened" by Koco Danaj's statement,
which does not express his personal stance, but is -- directly or indirectly
-- a reaffirmation of the all-Albanian national platform, an ideal of all
Albanians. This natural, legitimate, and ever-living aspiration to the
defense of national and state identity, of Ethnic Albania, and of the whole of
the Albanian nation in the Balkans is officially sanctioned in the
Constitution of the Republic of Albania, which was adopted in 1998 and which,
among other things says: "...with the centuries-long aspiration of the
Albanian people to preserve their identity and achieve national unification,
with the deep conviction that justice, peace, harmony, and cooperation among
nations are the highest values of mankind." (Preamble to the
Constitution of the Republic of Albania, Tirana, 2002, p 5.)
So no matter what Draskovic, Kostunica, Tadic,
Patriarch Pavle, Bishop Artemije, or the Serbian delegation to the Vienna
talks (which has warned that it will use "Greater Albania" as a
"justification" to defend Serbia's colonial sovereignty (over Kosova [Kosovo]
and its artificial territorial integrity) may say, this statement expresses
the aims of the official strategy, policy, and science of the Republic of
Albania, regardless of who may be at its head today, tomorrow, or the day
after.
History, politics, propaganda and diplomacy of
Serbia using the notion “Greater Albania” in order to keep still Albanian
native territories as their a classic colonial plunder. As a matter of
fact, this coherent accusation and attack in wrong address of Albanians of
Kosova and the other territories of Ethnic Albania in face of
the internatuional community (USA,
OUN, UE, NATO, OSCE ect.) is the best way to protect and justify the concept
of Great Serbia (1844-2008).
Moreover, that black resolution against independence of Kosova is very
prejudicial in the first place for Serbia own itself and its
people who is going to lead in very wrong and regress way, i.e. in
defoliate and total isolation from neighbor countries of Balkans,
integrated and democratic Europe, and international community entirely, as by
the time Slobodan Milosevich who in set terms rejects to endorse “Interim
Agreement for Peace and Self-Government in Kosovo”, Rambouillet, France -
February 23, 1999.
Serbia’s
Parliament and Government, as well as their leaders (its president, Boris Tadic
and prime minister, Voislav Kostunica) must be aware that there is no
integration within European Union without recogonation of independence of Kosova.
Nations with unresolved colonial problems such is
Serbia
in this case with colonial problem of Kosova cannot be any kind of legal part
of European Union (EU).
/ sended to
ereniku.net Sat, January 12, 2008 12:37 pm /
ESSAY

Mehdi HYSENI, Ph.D*
30 dhjetor, 2007
POLITICAL-NATIONAL “SYMPHONY AND CACOPHONY” OF THE
SERBIAN
ORTHODOX
CHURCH
VERSUS KOSOVA’S
INDEPENDENCE
* It is crucial that Washington, the UN,
the EU, and all international diplomatic organizations do not accept political
talks at any level from Serbian bishop Artemije Radosvaljevic as his
proclaimed role as “special state envoy” of the Republic of Serbia. The
Serbian Orthodox Church (although de facto, is practicing politics on the
pretense of protecting Serbian national and state interests) is not an
international legal subject recognized by the international community (like
states within the international system). Furthermore, de jure, it is no form
of a political-state institution of
Serbia,
but only one religious institution.
As a result of the installation of the UNMIK and
KFOR, Kosova de facto and de jure detached from genocidal
Serbia
(in accordance to Resolution 1244 of the United Nations Security Council
July
10, 1999). Until December
2006, the Serbian Orthodox Church managed by Serbian bishop Artemije
Radosavljevic, continued to run a propaganda campaign of defamations against
Albanians and the Kosova Liberation Army (KLA).
In consequence of propagandistic and religious
infiltrations by the Serbian Orthodox Church on the matter of the Serbian
minority in Kosova under the directives and instructions of
Belgrade’s
government, the governing administration of the UNMIK was compromised both
politically and legally from Chief Dr. Bernard Kushner to Soren Jesen
Petersen. Without any valid reason, they made concessions in favor of the
irrational requests of the Serbian Orthodox Church by opening talks with
Belgrade
in order to reach a common solution of the simulated and nonexistent problem
of the rights of the Serbian minority in Kosova.
How has international juridical base been in
accordance with the present rules and procedure of the peace-loving missions
of the United Nations and the cooperation of the UNMIK with
Serbia?
The premature abdication of the administrators-in-chief of the UNMIK, (Bernard
Kushner, Hans Hekerup, Harry Holker and Soren J. Petersen) came as a direct
consequence of the political sabotaging and provocative compulsion by the
Serbian Orthodox Church led by their “head-angel” Bishop Artemije
Radosavljevic, who then and now has not changed his negative views on the
United States
and the UNMIK. Radosavljevic described it as a “piratical act of the robbery
of Kosova from
Serbia”
upon the installation of the UNMIK and KFOR. This type of classification by
Radosavljevic implies that the
United States,
UNMIK and KFOR are essentially now occupiers of
Serbia.
However, it does not come as a surprise that
Serbia
has declared such a fickle, inhuman and unlawful assertion upon NATO’s
intervention and bombardments against
Serbia
because of their genocidal aggression in Kosova (March-June 1999). Apart from
the sly politics and the flatteries made by the Serbian Orthodox Church and
the Serbian government in order to profit unnatural allies, as well as foreign
credits and investments that are to be recovered from national and
ecclesiastic ash and genocidal terror of the Serbian regime of Slobodan
Milosevic, the United States, NATO, KFOR, UNMIK, Albanians and Albania
collectively are considered “enemies and occupiers” of Serbia, especially by
the Serbian Chetnik lobby in America, and everywhere in the world.
Radosavljevic’s official visit to
Washington
in the beginning of October 2006 should be fully comprehended within this
context.
How a Great-Serbian “Chief Diplomat”
Convinced
Washington
to “Close Its Mouth” About Kosova’s
Independence
The campaign against Albanians and the
independence of Kosova, carried out by the Belgrade-based government of
Serbia,
the Serbian Orthodox Church and advocates of Great Serbia, is developing in
the same manner as when their leader Slobodan Milosevic came to power in 1989.
The double-edged sword politics played by
Serbia
against Kosova’s independence and the KLA (currently known as the Kosova
Protection Corpus) was proven during the most recent visit of Artemije
Radosavljevic to
Washington,
which was arranged by the Serbian Chetnik-fascist lobbyists in
America
in conjunction with
Serbia’s
Belgrade-based government.
Indeed this was not the first time, and surely
will not be the last visit by Radosavljevic to
Washington.
From 1999 to 2006, when Kosova came under international jurisdiction and
administration of the United Nations (UNMIK and KFOR), the Serbian
national-chauvinist and so-called chief diplomat, Bishop Radosavljevic,
together with previous and present firebugs of Kosova (1989-2006) visited
Washington at least seven times. Politically, this is evidence of the
historical continuity of “symphony” and “cacophony” caused by the Serbian
Orthodox Church, as it still remains the main pillar of the Serbian state
power, as well as one of the most relevant political factors in Kosova.
Why has the bishop Artemije Radosavljevic and
the Serbian Orthodox Church assumed the role of the Serbian government and
politicians of Belgrade, when it is evident that the Serbian Orthodox Church
is neither a governmental subject nor a political organization? Its purpose is
that of a religious institution which does not hold authority to interfere in
politics and state issues. This political-judicial, governmental-ecclesiastic
and religious paradox is most illustrative of the argument that
Serbia,
since its establishment has constantly been governed by the Serbian Orthodox
Church. This is the only paradoxical paradigm in the world of international
government system.
The Serbian Orthodox Church has persistently
interfered in the political “symphony” and “cacophony” at both the state and
international levels. This historical coherence proves its negative,
subversive role as a propagandistic, saboteur in Kosova, not only during the
seven years when Kosova was under international juridical and administration
mandate (1999-2006), but from the
Ottoman Empire
rule up until now. According to the Great-Serbian imperial goals,
Serbia
has everlastingly had plans to break up the territorial integrality of ethnic
Albania
and to exterminate Albanians altogether. They would attempt to justify their
actions on the basis of being the legal owner of ethnic Albanian territories,
which includes Kosova. The main merits of this appalling genocidal plan belong
to the Serbian Orthodox Church and its genocidal and fundamentalist Slave
clergymen.
The Goals of the Serbian Orthodox Church
“Diplomats” in their Visit to the American State Department
Why did Bishop Artemije Radosavljevic choose
just
Washington
to visit in order to pin accusations on Albanians and Kosova? The answer is
very simple and clear: because
Washington
holds important political weight that will decide the future status of Kosova.
According to Artemije Radosavljevic’s statement,
the main goal of the Serbian Orthodox Church’s delegation’s visit to the
American State Department was to request more time on the settlement of
Kosova’s issue because, as they claim, Serbians have been gaining more
support, while “Muslim fascists” (a term used as an allusion to Kosova’s
Albanians in a most provocative sense, and an attempt to label other Albanians
in general as Muslim fundamentalists) have been losing theirs. The Serbian
delegation’s address to Congress resulted in the loss of support by members of
Congress for the independence of Kosova. (Las Javnosti, 04.10.2006).
It is clear that Radosavljevic’s initiatives,
during his visit to the
U.S.
capital were to persuade
Washington
to abandon their support for the independence of Kosova. Radosavljevic’s
address to the American Congress proved that there is not any political
“novas” for American or Albanian diplomacy. However, in essence there is only
a continual parrot relapse of requests by the Serbian Orthodox Church and
Belgrade’s
government in order to convince the
United States
that Kosova must continue to remain further as ancient colonial property of
Serbia.
This scandalous request made by the Serbian
Orthodox Church does not come as a surprise at all. It lacks any ethical,
political and juridical basis. Furthermore, it was clearly a propagandistic
anti-Albanian reservation made by the Serbian bishop Radosavljevic when he
asserted the notion that Serbs are gaining more support by the
United States
while “Muslim fascists” are losing theirs.
Indeed, Radosavljevic’s arbitrary and vicious
offenses are made in the same manner as Hitler’s fascist propaganda, however
on the pretext that the Albanians of Kosova are “fascist Muslims.” These
defamations indirectly also qualify
Washington
officials and Albanian politicians in
Albania
as well as throughout the Albanian diasporas as “fascist Islamites” as well.
On the contrary, because Great-Serbs fail to
interact with rational reasoning, the legitimacy of the war cause of the
Kosova Liberation Army (KLA) and NATO’s military intervention to break the
backbone the Slobodan Milosevic’s genocidal military, paramilitary and police
forces, is verified. The genocide committed in
Croatia,
Bosnia
and Kosova by
Serbia
has revealed to the world that the fascist and terrorist aggressors in
international dimensions are
Serbia
and the Serbian Orthodox Church. This became a well-known truth throughout
Europe
and the
United States
when the atavistic barbarism of Serbian Chetniks and
Serbia
occurred during the last decade of the 20th century (1992-1999) when these
genocides occurred. Nevertheless, Great-Serbian politicians and the Serbian
Orthodox Church led by Radosavljevic are using all means to try and eliminate
these facts from Albanian and international memory and history.
For that reason, the Serbian Orthodox Church and
Serbian governmental officials need not travel to
Vienna,
Brussels,
New York
and
Washington
to accuse Albanians of “Islamic terrorism.” Historically, this hideous
phenomenon has never been practiced by the doctrine of Albanian politics. In
lieu of this political practice at the end of the 20th century that
caused the death of hundreds and thousands of Albanians, Croatians and
Bosnians (1992-1999) in the Balkans, Radosvaljevic first needs to seek through
his “club” staff of the Serbian Orthodox Church and in other state
institutions and organs of Serbia, for the main masterminds, initiators,
executioners and bearers of Slave terrorism, genocide, fascism,
national-chauvinism, fundamentalism and radicalism not only in the Balkans,
but throughout Europe.
In this context, it is enough to remember the
“erased memory” of these genocides, and that Great-Serbian Radosavljevic’s
mentioned terrorism has its roots in Serbia and in Serbian collective
anti-Semitism, not in Kosova, Albania, nor among Albanians who for centuries
(1842-2006) have been victims of Serbia’s institutional state terrorism and
genocide.
To truly realize
Serbia’s
status as the cradle of local, regional and international terrorism, consider
five of the most drastic cases of
Serbia’s
political terrorist history.
Serbia,
because of its “porno-nationalism” and hegemonic ideology aspires to conquer
Hungarian, Croatian and Albanian territories in order to establish Great
Serbia (Velika Serbija). Ever since the First World War,
Serbia
has organized and committed several terrorist attacks both secretly and
publicly, in order to fulfill this nationalist dream, some of which include:
(1) the assassination of Austro-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the
successor to the Austrian throne, by Gavrilo Princip in
Sarajevo,
Bosnia
&
Herzegovina
on
June
28, 1914. Soon following this
terrorist attack, Austria declared war on Serbia, an action that initiated
World War I; (2) the killing of Croatian deputy Stjepan Radich by Punisha
Rachich of the Serbian-Croatian-Slovenian parliament on May 25, 1928; (3) the
assassination of Croatian academic, Milan Shuflaj on February 18, 1931 in
Zagreb; (4) the killing of Serbian Prime Minister Dr. Zoran Djindjich on March
12, 2003 committed by special “red berets” or the so-called “Zemun Clan”; and
(5) the killing of Swedish Foreign Minister, Ana Lind committed by Mihajlo
Mihajlovich in Stockholm on September 10, 2003.
At last,
Serbia
along with their state authorities (President Boris Tadich, Prime minister,
Vojislav Kostunica, Foreign minister, Vuk Draskovich) and the Serbian Orthodox
Church led by Bishop Artemije Radosavljevic, and his secretary Simeon, must
first rid themselves of state and individual terrorism brought by the
Great-Serbian “jihad.” It is then, when they have washed themselves of their
own state terrorism that they might appeal to the American State Department to
present their false witness accounts and documents simulated in order to
discourage
U.S.
recognition of an independent Kosova under the pretense that it will transform
into an “Islamic jihad state.”
The alleged historical, political and juridical
justification that Radosavljevic and the Serbian Orthodox Church utilizes is
that if Kosova becomes an independent state tomorrow, it will inevitably
become an “Islamic jihad state.” This anti-Albanian propagandistic thesis is a
recycled political technique used by the Serbian Orthodox Church. Together
with the Serbian government the Serbian Orthodox Church, who invented this
malicious thesis in disfavor of Kosova’s independence, still consider Kosova
as the “cradle” and “ heart” of Serbia and Serbs, even though de facto and de
jure Kosova is not, and will never more be under colonial sovereignty of Great
Serbia.
In this sense, on
October
1, 2006, the parliament of
Serbia
adopted a new Constitution, but with the old provision that Kosova is an
integral part of
Serbia.
Several events accompanied the adoption of this constitution including the
avoidance from the itinerary debating the draft-Resolution about Kosova’s
independence by the Parliamentary Assembly of the European Council (October 2,
2006); the official visit to Washington made by the Serbian Orthodox Church
led by Bishop Radosavljevic; the sabotage of Serbian–Albanian negotiations
about Kosova in the capital city Vienna, Austria; as well as the request of
all Serbian political spectrum opposition parties and the Serbian Orthodox
Church to eliminate international special envoy of the United Nations Security
Council, Marti Ahtisari from his charged mission to resolve Kosova’s final
status. These events indicate that the recent eristic propaganda and diplomacy
of
Serbia
has elevated the political temperature not only in Serbian public opinion, but
amongst international relations, in order to buy time to postpone the solution
status of Kosova until after holding parliamentary elections in
Serbia
on
January
21, 2007.
However,
the procrastination of this deadline is neither convenient for American policy
nor for Albanian policy. For this reason both parties need to be maximally engaged
in the solving of Kosova’s status in order to be finished by the designated
deadline set by the United Nations Security Council, set to expire in 2006.
This should occur independent of the of the adoption of the new Serbian Constitution,
the holding of the Referendum during the last quarter of 2006, and parliamentary
elections in Serbia in January 2007, because not one of these issues concerns
Kosova and Albanians, but solely pertain to Serbia and Serbs. This is the internal
issue of Serbia,
not Kosova, nor America,
nor Europe./To:
info@ereniku.net/ Date: Sat, December 29, 2007 9:41 am /